top of page

C/O Futures Mexican Cartel Imagery Archive


Robert J. Bunker


15 October 2026


Cartel FPV drones and fiber-optic canisters seized near Agua Verde, Sinaloa

Seizure of cartel FPV drones, fiber-optic canisters, and other armaments near Agua Verde, Sinaloa. Source: Coordinación Interinstitucional Sinaloa, 12 October 2026.


A Third Confirmed Fiber-Optic Cartel Drone Seizure


The seizure of 48 first-person-view (FPV) drones and 44 fiber-optic canisters near Agua Verde, Sinaloa, marks the third confirmed recovery of Mexican cartel FPV systems accompanied by fiber-optic command-and-control (C2) components.


The scale of the cache is significant. Mexican authorities also reported recovering 64 drone batteries, 200 rounds of ammunition, drone accessories, 20 ballistic plates, six tactical vests, and 16 tactical uniforms during the operation along the El Rosario–Agua Verde highway.


More important than the size of any single seizure is the emerging pattern. The Agua Verde cache follows closely behind fiber-optic FPV equipment recovered in El Rosario on 5 October 2026 and in Concordia in late September 2026. All three seizures are geographically clustered in Sinaloa and are associated with ongoing suppression operations directed against factions of the Cártel de Sinaloa (CDS) and their Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG) allies.


Taken together, the three seizures provide increasingly strong evidence that fiber-optic-controlled FPV systems are moving beyond isolated experimentation and into larger cartel inventories.


Key Findings

  • Mexican authorities reported seizing 48 drones, 44 rolls/canisters of fiber-optic cable, and 64 drone batteries near Agua Verde, Sinaloa.

  • The seizure represents the third confirmed cartel recovery involving FPV drones and fiber-optic C2 components.

  • One open-source analyst identified the seized drones as MK4 V2 10-inch FPV drones.

  • The Agua Verde seizure follows closely after confirmed fiber-optic FPV seizures in El Rosario and Concordia, Sinaloa.

  • The three incidents are geographically clustered and are associated with the operating environment of the La Mayiza and Los Chapitos factions of CDS and their CJNG ally.

  • Imagery from the seizure may also contain the first photographic indication of a cartel vehicle-mounted counter-UAS radio-frequency jammer, although the available imagery is insufficient for a positive identification.

  • C/O Futures assesses that the volume and packaging of the recovered FPV systems and fiber-optic components are consistent with bulk commercial procurement.

  • The expanding RF defeat environment created by growing cartel counter-UAS capabilities may be helping drive adoption of fiber-optic C2, which does not depend on a conventional RF control link.

  • The developing pattern suggests that combined FPV drone and fiber-optic systems may increasingly move from stockpiles and seizures into active cartel fielding.


The Agua Verde Seizure


The Mexican Army recovered the cache during an operation along the El Rosario–Agua Verde highway in the municipality of El Rosario, Sinaloa.


Reporting cited by the C/O Futures archive identified 48 drones, 64 drone batteries, 44 rolls of fiber-optic cable, 200 cartridges, drone accessories, 20 ballistic plates, six tactical vests, and 16 tactical uniforms among the seized materiel.


The operation formed part of a wider series of actions against organized crime conducted from 9–11 October 2026 across five municipalities in Sinaloa.


The publicly released seizure imagery is particularly valuable because it allows the drones and fiber-optic equipment to be viewed together as components of a larger operational inventory rather than as isolated pieces of technology.


Forty-Eight FPV Drones and Forty-Four Fiber-Optic Canisters


The seizure photographs show rows of boxed FPV drones alongside a substantial quantity of fiber-optic canisters and other equipment.


One open-source analyst, Pernicious Propaganda (@natsecboogie), assessed the recovered aircraft as MK4 V2 10-inch FPV drones. The packaging visible in the imagery also suggests that the systems were acquired in quantity rather than assembled as isolated individual platforms.


The ratio is itself notable: 48 drones and 44 fiber-optic canisters were reported in a single cache.


This is substantially larger than the earlier confirmed seizures and provides a clearer indication that fiber-optic control is becoming integrated into the broader cartel FPV ecosystem.


FPV drones and fiber-optic control canisters recovered in Sinaloa

Close view of FPV drones and fiber-optic canisters recovered in the Agua Verde seizure.


Three Confirmed Seizures in One Geographic Cluster


The Agua Verde cache does not exist in isolation.


The first confirmed seizure of cartel FPV systems associated with fiber-optic C2 components occurred in Concordia, Sinaloa, in late September 2026. That imagery showed three FPV drones and electronic components independently assessed as consistent with fiber-optic control equipment.


Only days later, a considerably larger cache was recovered in El Rosario on 5 October 2026, containing FPV drones, fiber-optic spools, controllers, goggles, receivers, batteries, explosives, and other equipment.


The Agua Verde recovery now represents the third confirmed seizure.

These incidents occurred in close geographic proximity and rapid succession. C/O Futures assesses that the activity involves the operating environment of the La Mayiza and Los Chapitos factions of Cártel de Sinaloa and/or their CJNG allies.


The repetition, scale, and geographic concentration of the seizures strengthen the assessment that fiber-optic FPV systems are developing into an operational cartel capability rather than remaining an isolated technological experiment.


A Possible New Cartel C-UAS Development


The Agua Verde imagery may contain another significant development.

Open-source analyst @ACondØr identified an object visible in the seizure photography as potentially representing a vehicle-mounted anti-drone radio-frequency jammer.

If positively identified, the imagery could represent the first photographic evidence of this type of cartel roof-mounted counter-unmanned aerial system.


Similar jammer systems mounted on improvised armored fighting vehicles have previously been reported in connection with CJNG, but C/O Futures notes that earlier photographic evidence had not been captured.


The available Agua Verde imagery is not sufficient for a positive identification, so the assessment should remain provisional. Nevertheless, the possible appearance of a vehicle-mounted jammer is important within the broader evolution of cartel drone warfare.


Cartel organizations are increasingly operating on both sides of the UAS/C-UAS competition: acquiring and adapting unmanned systems while simultaneously developing capabilities intended to defeat those fielded by rivals or security forces.


Possible cartel vehicle-mounted counter-UAS RF jammer in Agua Verde seizure imagery

Object visible in the Agua Verde imagery assessed as potentially representing a vehicle-mounted anti-drone RF jammer; positive identification remains unconfirmed.


The Expanding RF Defeat Environment


The development of cartel counter-UAS capabilities provides important context for the emergence of fiber-optic-controlled FPV drones.


Traditional FPV systems depend upon radio-frequency links for command, control, and video transmission. As jamming and other RF defeat capabilities proliferate, those links become increasingly vulnerable.


Fiber-optic control provides an alternative architecture in which the aircraft remains physically connected through a lightweight fiber-optic line, reducing dependence on the RF spectrum for control.


The preceding El Rosario analysis identified a potential “tipping point” at which CDS factions and CJNG appeared to be going “all in” on FPV drones in combination with fiber-optic C2.


The Agua Verde seizure—only days later and involving dozens of drones and fiber-optic canisters—provides additional evidence supporting that assessment.


Bulk Procurement and Capability Proliferation


The C/O Futures archive assesses that the FPV racing drones and fiber-optic C2 components appearing in these recent seizures were likely purchased in bulk from

Chinese online distributors, based in part on the commercial packaging visible across the seizure imagery.


This is important because commercially available systems can dramatically lower the barrier to acquiring sophisticated unmanned capabilities.


Rather than requiring a cartel organization to independently design and manufacture a complete drone architecture, commercial supply channels allow airframes, controllers, fiber-optic components, batteries, and other equipment to be acquired in volume and subsequently adapted for operational purposes.


FPV racing drones can then be weaponized through the addition of improvised explosive payloads.


The result is an increasingly accessible pathway from commercial technology to weaponized cartel capability.


From a “Tipping Point” Toward Active Fielding


The rapid succession of the Concordia, El Rosario, and Agua Verde seizures suggests that the development is accelerating.


The El Rosario archive assessed that the scale of that seizure might represent a tipping point in cartel adoption of FPV drones operating in tandem with fiber-optic C2.

Agua Verde now adds 48 drones and 44 fiber-optic canisters to that emerging picture.

C/O Futures therefore expects that combined FPV drone and fiber-optic C2 systems will increasingly begin to appear in active cartel operations associated with the criminal insurgencies underway in parts of Mexico.


The implications are significant. The Russo-Ukrainian conflict has demonstrated the effectiveness and lethality that mass employment of FPV systems can produce when inexpensive commercial technology is adapted to persistent tactical use.

The growing Mexican cartel inventory should therefore be viewed not simply as the accumulation of drones, but as the emergence of an increasingly integrated FPV warfare ecosystem involving airframes, fiber-optic control, improvised explosive payloads, and counter-UAS technology.


Assessment


The Agua Verde seizure substantially strengthens the emerging pattern identified in earlier C/O Futures imagery archives.


The progression is increasingly clear:


An unverified fiber-optic cartel FPV indication in October 2025 was followed by a confirmed Concordia seizure in late September 2026, a much larger El Rosario cache on 5 October 2026, and now the recovery of 48 FPV drones and 44 fiber-optic canisters near Agua Verde.


The scale and tempo of these incidents make it increasingly difficult to characterize fiber-optic FPV capability as a niche or isolated cartel experiment.

Instead, the evidence suggests an ongoing process of procurement, accumulation, adaptation, and diffusion.


At the same time, seizures document capability in inventory—not necessarily the frequency or effectiveness of operational employment. The next critical indicator will therefore be the appearance of reliable imagery or reporting showing these combined FPV and fiber-optic systems being used in actual cartel operations.


Indications & Warning


Several developments warrant continued monitoring.


Operational use of fiber-optic FPV drones.


Future imagery showing complete fiber-optic FPV systems actively employed by cartel forces would represent an important transition from procurement and stockpiling to routine operational use.


Additional geographically dispersed seizures.


Fiber-optic caches appearing outside the current Sinaloa cluster would indicate that the capability is diffusing more broadly among Mexican criminal organizations.


Larger bulk procurements.


Additional commercial packaging, standardized airframes, fiber-optic canisters, and associated control equipment would provide further evidence of organized supply chains rather than isolated acquisition.


Cartel counter-UAS systems.


Improved imagery of vehicle-mounted RF jammers or other cartel counter-drone systems would help establish the extent to which the RF defeat environment is influencing adversary drone adaptation.


Weaponized FPV systems.


Continued recovery of aerial bomblets, improvised explosive payloads, and FPV airframes should be monitored for evidence that larger inventories are being configured for kinetic employment.


Adaptation between UAS and C-UAS capabilities.


The interaction between cartel drone fielding, jamming, counter-drone systems, and alternative control architectures may become an increasingly important driver of technological change.


Download the Full C/O Futures Imagery Archive


The complete eight-page C/O Futures Mexican Cartel Imagery Archive contains the original seizure imagery, source reporting, analysis of the FPV drones and fiber-optic canisters, examination of a possible cartel C-UAS jammer, additional commentary and analysis, and supporting references associated with this incident.


Forty-Eight FPV Drones and Forty-Four Fiber Optic Canisters Seized in Agua Verde, Sinaloa (3rd Confirmed Cartel Fiber Optics Seizure).pdf



Related C/O Futures Research



C/O Futures previously examined the large 5 October 2026 El Rosario seizure of cartel FPV drones, fiber-optic C2 equipment, explosives, and associated operating components. The cache was assessed as a potential tipping point in cartel adoption of FPV drones operating in tandem with fiber-optic control.



C/O Futures examined the late-September 2026 Concordia seizure that provided the first confirmed recovery of cartel FPV drones associated with equipment independently assessed as consistent with fiber-optic C2.



Earlier C/O Futures research documented the first unverified indication of Mexican cartel use of a fiber-optic-controlled FPV drone, providing an early warning of the capability now appearing across multiple confirmed seizures.



C/O Futures previously examined reporting concerning Mexican and Colombian cartel-linked personnel traveling to Ukraine and the potential acquisition and transfer of FPV kamikaze drone tactics, techniques, and procedures.


Work With C/O Futures


C/O Futures provides specialized research, threat analysis, intelligence support, briefings, red teaming, and training related to emerging threats, adversarial technologies, and evolving operational environments.




Follow C/O Futures Research


Receive newly published C/O Futures research notes and analyses by email.


C/O Futures Mexican Cartel Imagery Archive


Robert J. Bunker


12 October 2026


Seizure of cartel FPV drones, fiber-optic equipment, explosives, and related armaments in El Rosario, Sinaloa. Source: Coordinación Interinstitucional Sinaloa, 6 October 2026.


A Second Confirmed Fiber-Optic Cartel Drone Cache


A large cache of first-person-view (FPV) racing drones, fiber-optic command-and-control (C2) components, explosives, and related armaments recovered in El Rosario, Sinaloa, provides significant new evidence of the continuing evolution of Mexican cartel drone capabilities.


The seizure occurred on 5 October 2026 and was subsequently publicized by the Coordinación Interinstitucional Sinaloa. Reporting associated with the operation identified 15 drones, 15 remote controls, 15 rolls of fiber-optic cable, 14 drone batteries, and 42 improvised explosive devices (IEDs) along with rifles, ammunition, tactical vests, and ballistic plates.


The significance of the seizure extends beyond its size. It represents the second confirmed cartel cache containing fiber-optic C2 components, following the recovery of FPV drones and associated fiber-optic equipment in Concordia, Sinaloa, in late September 2026.


The two seizures occurred roughly 40 miles apart and in rapid succession. Together, they provide growing evidence that fiber-optic control is moving beyond isolated experimentation and beginning to appear alongside larger inventories of cartel FPV systems.


Key Findings

  • Mexican authorities reported the seizure of 15 drones, 15 remote controls, 15 fiber-optic cable rolls, 14 batteries, and 42 IEDs in El Rosario, Sinaloa.

  • Image-based analysis of the released seizure imagery identified what appear to be 19 FPV drone airframes of several sizes and configurations.

  • Identified equipment included RadioMaster controllers, FPV goggles, video receivers, and at least 10 visible fiber-optic spools.

  • An additional 28 brown boxes visible in the imagery were assessed as potentially containing additional fiber-optic spools and associated ground and sky modules.

  • The El Rosario seizure represents the second confirmed cartel fiber-optic C2 cache, following the late-September 2026 Concordia seizure.

  • The two confirmed seizures occurred approximately 40 miles apart and likely involve the La Mayiza or Los Chapitos factions of Cártel de Sinaloa and/or their Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generación allies.

  • C/O Futures assesses that the scale of the El Rosario cache may represent a tipping point in cartel adoption of FPV drones combined with fiber-optic C2, potentially driven by an increasingly contested radio-frequency environment and expanding counter-UAS capabilities.


The El Rosario Seizure


The seizure was carried out within the framework of the Coordinación Interinstitucional Sinaloa, a joint effort involving multiple levels of Mexican public safety and security organizations, including Seguridad, Defensa, Marina, Guardia Nacional, the Fiscalía General de la República, and the Fiscalía General del Estado.


According to reporting cited in the C/O Futures archive, Mexican Army personnel seized an arsenal in the municipality of Rosario that included three rifles, six magazines, 155 rounds of ammunition, three tactical vests, six ballistic plates, 15 drones, 15 remote controls, 15 rolls of fiber-optic cable, and 14 drone batteries.


The same reporting identified 42 improvised explosive devices among the seized materiel. The C/O Futures archive notes, however, that the explosives themselves were not evident in the publicly released imagery.


Authorities did not specify the exact location of the cache within the municipality, the circumstances surrounding the military deployment, or whether any individuals were detained during the operation.


What the Seizure Imagery Shows


The released imagery provides a considerably more detailed view of the unmanned systems and associated equipment than the initial seizure figures alone.

Open-source analysis conducted by Pernicious Propaganda (@natsecboogie), in coordination with @ACondØr, identified the following FPV systems and components visible in the imagery:

  • 9 unidentified 5–7 inch FPV drones

  • 8 Mark4 V2 10-inch FPV drones

  • 1 unidentified 10-inch FPV drone

  • 1 unidentified 13/14/15-inch FPV drone

  • 3 5.8 GHz video receivers

  • 6 RadioMaster TX12 controllers

  • 3 RadioMaster Pocket controllers

  • 5 EV800D FPV goggles

  • 10 visible fiber-optic spools

  • 28 brown boxes potentially containing additional fiber-optic spools with associated ground and sky modules


The image-based assessment therefore appears to identify 19 FPV airframes, compared with the 15 drones cited in the initial reporting. The available source material does not resolve this difference, so the two figures are best treated separately: 15 as the reported seizure total and 19 as the subsequent image-based identification.


FPV racing drones visible among the materiel recovered in El Rosario, Sinaloa.


Fiber-Optic C2 Is the Central Development


The large quantity of fiber-optic equipment is the most significant aspect of the El Rosario seizure.


Unlike an isolated electronic component whose purpose must be inferred, the released imagery shows multiple fiber-optic spools positioned directly alongside FPV drones, controllers, receivers, goggles, batteries, and related operating equipment.


At least 10 fiber-optic spools were individually identified in the released imagery. The presence of an additional 28 boxes potentially containing further spools and ground/sky modules raises the possibility that the fiber-optic inventory was substantially larger.


Taken together, the concentration of equipment strongly supports the assessment that the recovered FPV systems were intended to operate using fiber-optic C2.


This makes El Rosario particularly important because it follows almost immediately after the first confirmed cartel seizure involving fiber-optic FPV components in Concordia, Sinaloa.


Fiber-optic spools, controllers, receivers, and related FPV operating equipment recovered in the El Rosario seizure.


Close view of fiber-optic spools and associated FPV control equipment recovered in El Rosario.


From an Unverified Indicator to Two Confirmed Seizures


The development of cartel fiber-optic FPV capability can now be viewed as an emerging sequence rather than as a single isolated incident.


The first indication identified by C/O Futures appeared on 2 October 2025, when social-media imagery appeared to show a Mexican cartel FPV drone using fiber-optic control. That incident remained unverified.


Nearly one year later, the late-September 2026 Concordia seizure provided the first confirmed cache of components associated with cartel fiber-optic FPV systems.


The El Rosario seizure followed only days later and is considerably larger.

The geographic proximity of the Concordia and El Rosario incidents is also noteworthy. The two seizures occurred approximately 40 miles apart and are assessed as potentially involving the La Mayiza or Los Chapitos factions of Cártel de Sinaloa and/or their CJNG allies.


The clustering of multiple fiber-optic-related incidents in the same broader operating environment substantially strengthens the indications that this capability is moving into operational cartel inventories.


A Potential Tipping Point in Cartel FPV Operations


C/O Futures assesses that the scale of the El Rosario seizure may represent a tipping point in the adoption of FPV drones and fiber-optic control by Mexican cartels.


The cache contains not simply several drones but a broader operating ecosystem: multiple airframes, controllers, goggles, receivers, batteries, fiber-optic spools, and potentially additional boxed fiber-optic systems.

This suggests capability development occurring at a larger scale than experimentation with a single prototype or isolated system.


The archive assesses that this development is likely connected to the expanding radio-frequency defeat environment surrounding cartel drone operations. As cartel and government counter-unmanned aerial systems capabilities continue to proliferate, actors have increasing incentives to field systems that rely on alternative control architectures.


The emergence of fiber-optic C2 should therefore be viewed as part of an ongoing cycle of adaptation between cartel unmanned systems and the technologies intended to counter them.


Implications and Indications & Warning


The El Rosario seizure reinforces several developments that warrant continued monitoring.


Future seizures should be examined for the repeated co-location of FPV airframes, fiber-optic spools, ground and sky modules, controllers, and related operating equipment. Additional caches of this type would provide further evidence that fiber-optic FPV systems are moving into wider cartel inventories.


The appearance of multiple FPV sizes and configurations in a single cache also suggests that cartel organizations may be developing broader unmanned-system inventories rather than relying on a single standardized platform.


Continued geographic diffusion should also be monitored. The rapid appearance of two confirmed fiber-optic caches in Sinaloa raises the question of whether similar systems will begin appearing in seizures associated with other cartel organizations and regions.


Finally, the relationship between counter-UAS proliferation and fiber-optic C2 adoption should remain an important indications-and-warning issue. The El Rosario cache may represent an early indication of how Mexican cartel drone operations are adapting to increasingly contested low-altitude and radio-frequency environments.


Download the Full C/O Futures Imagery Archive


The complete nine-page C/O Futures Mexican Cartel Imagery Archive contains the original seizure imagery, source reporting, close-in views of the FPV drones and fiber-optic equipment, component identification, additional commentary and analysis, and supporting references associated with this incident.


Large Cache of Cartel FPV Racing Drones, Fiber Optic C2 Components and Explosives Recovered in El Rosario, Sinaloa (2nd Confirmed Cartel Fiber Optics Seizure).pdf


Download PDF


Related C/O Futures Research


C/O Futures previously examined the late-September 2026 recovery of three cartel FPV racing drones and associated components in Concordia, Sinaloa. Independent forensic analysis of the recovered equipment provided the first confirmed seizure evidence of cartel fiber-optic FPV C2 components.


Earlier C/O Futures research documented the first unverified indication of Mexican cartel use of a fiber-optic-controlled FPV drone, providing an initial warning of the capability that is now appearing in confirmed seizures.


C/O Futures examined a purported cartel drone-on-drone kinetic engagement in Michoacán and its potential relationship to counter-UAS tactics observed on the Russo-Ukrainian battlefronts.


C/O Futures previously examined reporting concerning Mexican and Colombian cartel-linked personnel traveling to Ukraine and the potential acquisition and transfer of FPV kamikaze drone tactics, techniques, and procedures.


Work With C/O Futures


C/O Futures provides specialized research, threat analysis, intelligence support, briefings, red teaming, and training related to emerging threats, adversarial technologies, and evolving operational environments.




Follow C/O Futures Research


Receive newly published C/O Futures research notes and analyses by email.


C/O Futures Book Review


Pamela Ligouri Bunker


16 September 2026


Mauro Lubrano, Stop the Machines: The Rise of Anti-Technology Extremism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2025. Softcover; 190 pages. ISBN 978-1509555741.



Understanding Anti-Technology Extremism


Released in 2025, Stop the Machines by Mauro Lubrano is a fascinating look at an understudied area of extremism in which actors emphasize the negative effects of technological advancement, in some cases culminating in violent acts. Lubrano, who earned his doctorate from the University of St. Andrews in political violence and terrorism, is now a lecturer in International Relations & Politics at the University of Bath. He encountered the present-day phenomenon of anti-technology extremism in serendipitous fashion as a graduate student when, on a whim, he attended a 2019 gathering in Berlin on the “Fall of AI: A Call to Fight.” There he was introduced to the spectrum of what individuals believed should be done to counter that particular technological threat, including violence against those even tangentially promoting AI. Intrigued, his subsequent research found a breadth of historical and present-day anti-technology sentiment, some of which advocated violent means to those ends. Thus, while Lubrano’s book is particularly prescient given the current alarm bells being set off by the rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), it also offers insights across a wider swath of technological arenas (e.g. water resources or the electric power grid) potentially threatened by violent extremists.


The 190-page work is an easy read and consists of an introduction, five chapters, and a conclusion, along with chapter notes, a selected bibliography, and a useful index. The Introduction outlines the author’s journey in researching and understanding the phenomenon of anti-technology extremism. He then outlines what constitutes ‘extremism.’ Going beyond what might be considered ‘radicalism,’ extremist groups are often Manichean in nature and glorify violent means to their ends, with victims chosen not for who they are but for what they represent. Anti-technology extremism crosses a number of ideological currents— often resulting in ‘strange bedfellows’ on particular issues—and he finds it can be fruitfully examined within three distinct milieus: insurrectionary anarchism, eco-extremism, and eco-fascism.


Long Live King Ludd!


The first chapter, Long Live King Ludd!, seeks to counter any comparison of these latter-day groups to the original Luddites and briefly outlines the historical evolution of anti-technology trends and the related activist individuals and organizations which rose and fell over time. He describes how the 1811 Luddite movement, led by a mythical ‘Ned Ludd,’ involved destruction of a new technology—knitting frames—but the movement was not against technology per se. Rather, he reiterates Eric Hobswan’s description of it as ‘collective bargaining by riot,’ a means of trade unionism to protect skilled labor (p. 15). He acknowledges, however, that anti-technology sentiment has been part and parcel of the four Industrial Revolutions which had dramatic repercussions on all aspects of labor as well as social life. Quoting Gilbert Ramsey, he emphasizes the way in which a leap in technology both “…changes what we want, and how we understand our very existence (p. 10).” Recognizing the obvious benefits technology can provide, Lubrano then unpacks the dark side to technological progress; one which not only negatively impacts individual livelihoods, but also reduces civil liberties, exacerbates social disparities, and allows us to destroy each other with an ease previously unknown. It is these effects to which subsequent waves of anti-technology movements have responded. Particular mention in this chapter is given to Ted Kaczynski, aka ‘the Unabomber,” whose terrorist acts from 1975 to 1995 along with his anti-technology manifesto has served to influence a wide range of anti-technology extremists to the present day.


Smash the Prison Society: Insurrectionary Anarchism


Chapter Two, Smash the Prison Society: Insurrectionary Anarchism, looks at the first of the three primary milieus in which anti-technology extremists are found. The insurrectionary form of anarchism is herein described, following Francesco. Marone’s conceptualization as “an extremist tendency within the anarchist movement which emphasizes the practice of revolutionary ‘insurrection’ through illegal and violent actions (p. 40).” As anarchism has in the past embraced technology (e.g. dynamite) in its drive to take direct action (‘propaganda of the deed’) against authoritative governance, this milieu is somewhat counterintuitive to the reader at first. Lubrano explains that the issue of technology has become predominant due to its increasingly perceived role as central to the capitalist socioeconomic system, with particular emphasis on computers and IT (and assumedly more so AI) for control of information and surveillance. A secondary concern is the way in which it divorces humans from existing in the natural world and the harm it does to the environment. This group continues to be distinguished by the way it continues to be willing to use technology to destroy technology or ‘fight fire with fire.’ While many acts of destruction and sabotage are documented—such as the cited attack on an electricity pylon halting Tesla production in Germany in 2024—the author contends that such attacks are far less likely to target humans and rarely result in casualties.


Nature Fights Back: Eco-Extremists


Chapter Three, Nature Fights Back: Eco-Extremists, traces the roots of eco-extremism to the dawn of radical environmentalism in the 1950s and the concept of ‘deep ecology’ which gained traction in the early 1970s. These philosophical perspectives would foment the ideas of ecotage and later ‘monkeywrenching,’ whereby activists would sabotage the means for environmental disruption such as spiking trees to hinder logging or damaging construction machinery. Primarily aimed at nonhuman targets, Lubrano sees labelling this activity ‘ecoterror’ to be misguided. Still, he shows that more recently the violence has gone beyond rudimentary acts of sabotage to be directly aimed at individuals complicit in environmental damage—such as the IED sent to the CEO of Chile’s largest mining company which injured the CEO and his daughter in 2017. Following Kacyzinski’s tenets, extremist groups are said to have coalesced into two branches: the Wildists and the Eco-extremists. The latter however are said to have developed a deepening nihilism and practice a more indiscriminate violence. He warns that, although they have had less activity of late, they should not be dismissed.


Anti-Tech to Accelerate: Eco-Fascism


Chapter Four, Anti-Tech to Accelerate: Eco-Fascism, covers the last of Lubrano’s three milieus, an ideological current within the far-right. Eco-Fascism has existed as an undercurrent of the far-right since the mid-1800s but particularly post-WWII. Spurred on by such developments as Ruby Ridge and Waco, he explains that it gained traction along with the broader movement with the advent of online anonymous message boards. Accelerationist in nature, the anti-technology current is said to have taken hold most recently as it relates to overpopulation and immigration and has been cited by a number of active shooters—including Brenton Tarrant and Patrick Crusius—in their manifestos. Alarmingly, posts by members of eco-fascist groups highlight the ‘soft target’ nature of critical infrastructure. Lubrano cites these narratives as evidence of a potential evolution to a ‘full-fledged anti-technology assault.”


The Fight to End Civilization


The fifth chapter, The Fight to End Civilization, serves to draw together insights from the above to ascertain how the fight to eradicate technology might develop into widespread destruction. The biggest characteristic he cites is the ability of these groups to embrace flexibility. Synergy has developed from the cross-cutting nature of the movement against technology drawing strength throughout a number of ideological currents. Picking and choosing from amongst Kaczynski’s tenets, even as Kaczynski himself decries some of their narratives, it has become a movement of diverse individuals and groups with a common goal to ‘stop the machines.’ He cautions that the shared commitment to purpose does not equal a shared identity or any kind of directed action as such. Rather it feeds off conspiracy theories and the shared idea of technology as an existential threat. Lubrano portends—and indeed it seems to be his central argument—that the anticipation of an impending apocalyptic shift to a dystopian world can act as a significant catalyst for violence amongst these groups.


Conclusion


Finally, the Conclusion to the work is helpful in drawing together from the previous chapters who may be most a threat and in what arenas—particularly useful to security practitioners tasked with protecting our critical infrastructure. Overall, the book is unique in its attempt to address the broad range of actors from varying ideological backgrounds embracing anti-technology extremism and is a recommended read for those with either an academic or professional interest in the topic. He ends with the realistic but unsatisfying recognition that—as with many who use violence to promote their cause—the fears of anti-technology extremists are understandable and may even be valid, but their means are not. Addressing the root causes of terrorism is indeed an important aspect of countering the problem. Unfortunately, his consequent promotion of carefully fettered technological advances for the future and indeed a ‘paradigm shift’ in our relationship with technology—while certainly laudable—does come across as naïve despite his protestations to the contrary. The Fifth Industrial Revolution he sees on the horizon is already here—part and parcel of the post-modern epochal shift we are experiencing. As we are seeing with the latest whistleblowing on the destructive potential of the unfettered advancement of AI, trying to regulate and restrict technological breakthroughs falls on deaf ears when it becomes intertwined with great power competition and the struggle of hegemonic powers to hang on to their strategic advantage. In all fairness, given that this book was written over a year ago, it would be interesting to hear what Lubrano’s thoughts are in the face of these new developments.


Additional Reading


The Technological Society


Jacques Ellul (John Wilkinson, Trans.)


New York: Vintage Books, 1964.



Blood in the Machine: The Origins of the Rebellion Against Big Tech


Brian Merchant


New York: Little, Brown, and Company, 2023.



Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism


Yanis Varoufakis


Brooklyn, NY: 2024.



Download the Full C/O Futures Book Review


Read the complete six-page C/O Futures review of Mauro Lubrano’s Stop the Machines: The Rise of Anti-Technology Extremism.




Related C/O Futures Research



This C/O Futures research examines an apparent accelerationist-type critical infrastructure incident and its implications for extremist targeting and emerging threat environments.



This C/O Futures Terrorism Research Note examines the appearance of commercial and improvised flamethrowers in recent extremist and criminal incidents and the implications for law enforcement, homeland security, and critical infrastructure protection.


Work With C/O Futures


C/O Futures provides specialized research, threat analysis, intelligence support, briefings, red teaming, and training related to emerging threats, adversarial technologies, and evolving operational environments.




Follow C/O Futures Research


Receive newly published C/O Futures research notes and analyses by email.


© 2020-2026 by C/O Futures, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

bottom of page